Research shows that growth fueled through organic innovation is more profitable than growth driven by acquisition, in part because the organizational capability required is vastly different. But the litmus test is: How can established organizations build successful new businesses through corporate entrepreneurship, also referred to as Intrapreneurship, on an ongoing basis? This is also one of the key questions that […]
Tag Archives | Ambidexterity
Modern Dual Corporate Innovation Balances Defense with Offense
This is an excerpt of a post of mine, recently published at Haydn Shaugnessy’s journal “Hack & Craft”. Modern Dual Corporate Innovation Management approaches encompass two complementary directions of impact: Transforming the Core (by largely changing or even disrupting the existing operating model) Creating the New (by largely changing or even disrupting the existing business model) With […]
The Firm of the Future Will Manage Two Types of Businesses
Bain and Company has just published a worthwile article, debating on the question: What will the firm of the future look like? Among several characteristics, the authors also particularly anticipate future-proof companies to be required to manage two types of businesses by deploying distinct “engines”: Companies have always pursued innovation in their core business. Clayton Christensen has called […]
Organizational Agility Entails Complementary Innovation
Recently, I’ve come across a couple of posts and articles debating on the question: In order to increase agility, should organizations aim to become more nimble across their existing structures or should they capitalize on separated units/ventures – such as innovation or digital labs – being dedicated to initiate and develop explorative ideas and opportunities? Let’s define agility as […]
The Case for Dual Innovation
The first time I was advocating the idea of a dual innovation approach, here also referred to as organizational ambidexterity, is now more than 5 years ago. At this time it became pretty obvious to me that this concept – academically worn-out but deficiently or not at all put into practice in most organizations – would be of increasing importance […]
Balancing Innovation via Organizational Ambidexterity – Part 3
This is part three of a three-parts article co-written with innovation-3‘s Frank Mattes. The first part highlighted that radical and incremental innovation build on two different innovation set-ups (exploration and exploitation, respect. The second part showed in a sample of seven leading firms that ambidexterity is used in two main types – contextual and structural ambidexterity. […]
Customer Orientation Effects on Innovation
There is a lot of dicussion around how customer orientation effects innovation. The most extreme assertion is to “ignore the customer” in order to not becoming distracted from true innovativeness by getting too close to customers, limiting innovation to incremental new offerings. A research paper by V. Govindarajan, P. K. Kopalle and E. Danneels studies the effects of customer […]
Balancing Large and Small Firm Capabilities
As outlined in earlier posts, organizations need to balance exploitation (i.e. development of existing business) and exploration (i.e. creation of new businesses) in order to thrive on the short and long term. The corresponding integration of incremental and radical innovation can basically be achieved in different ways: Building ambidextrous and lean startup capabilities Established organizations with larger size usually target at extending their core business by incementally […]
Managing Innovation Portfolios – Part 2: Operational Portfolio Management
This is part two of a two-parts article co-written with Kevin McFarthing from Innovation Fixer. The first part can be found here. In our previous post, we discussed how Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) ensures that the content of the portfolio is driven by innovation strategy and associated targets. We would now like to move on to […]
Managing Innovation Portfolios – Part 1: Strategic Portfolio Management
This is part one of a two-parts article co-written with Kevin McFarthing from Innovation Fixer. The second part can be found here. Facing increasingly dynamic and unpredictable environments, firms are required to develop convenient innovation strategies, constantly adapt them to changing conditions and properly implement strategically-aligned initiatives throughout their organizations. Innovation portfolio management (IPM) can act […]
Search
Recent Posts
- Dual Innovation: Ambidexterity 2.0 August 18, 2020
- Future-proof Companies: Combining Agility with Ambidexterity July 16, 2020
- Digital Innovation Units: Setting-Up for Scaling-Up June 27, 2020
- Digital Transformation: Dual Approach to Business Model Innovation June 14, 2020
- Dual Innovation at a Glance November 13, 2019
- A Model for Integrative Innovation Management March 21, 2016
- Integrative Innovation February 19, 2013
- Innovation and Organizational Culture February 14, 2015
- Balancing Innovation via Organizational Ambidexterity May 29, 2013
- Innovation and Serendipity May 23, 2013
- Leveraging New Ventures for Innovation July 21, 2014
- Bad Innovation Systems Beat Good Innovators (Almost) Every Time March 26, 2017
- The Firm of the Future Will Manage Two Types of Businesses January 20, 2017
- Integrating Lean Startup and Design Thinking February 1, 2014
- Balancing Innovation via Organizational Ambidexterity – Part 2 August 12, 2013
- Dual innovation (Ambidexterity 2.0) - InnoUpdate: […] Scaling up: The foundation […]...
- Innovation Follows Culture Follows Structure – Innovation Excellence - Reporter Inovation: […] previous ideas tie in with our proposed...
- Innovation Follows Culture Follows Structure – Innovation Excellence - DLIT: […] preceding thoughts tie in with our propo...
- Innovation Follows Culture Follows Structure – Innovation Excellence |: […] preceding thoughts tie in with our propo...
- Innovation Follows Culture Follows Structure – Innovation Excellence | For Entrepreneurs and online business owners: […] preceding thoughts tie in with our propo...
- Innovation Follows Culture Follows Structure – Innovation Excellence: […] preceding thoughts tie in with our propo...
- PostBox Communications: These aspects that will drive your digital transfo...
- Srikanth Ramanujam: Interesting stuff. The intersection seems to be "...
- Marek Stepan: The strength of the situtational forces was the ma...
- Intrapreneur vs Entrepreneur – Characteristics, Examples and Definitions | Success Unscrambled: […] June 2017, Ralph-Christian Ohr wrote abo...
Recent Tweets
- RT @ralph_ohr: The #DigitalTwin is a core metaverse building block. 🧩 Catch up on the latest insights around the emergent #IndustrialMetav… 1 year ago retweeted via ralph_ohr
- RT @ralph_ohr: Bringing a digital platform to the home heating services market: Lessons from @Thermondo https://t.co/O9XB67831y #innovati… 1 year ago retweeted via ralph_ohr
- RT @ralph_ohr: What are venture studios and how can they help with climate innovation? https://t.co/sy7xA8sg5s @wef #innovation #climate #v… 1 year ago retweeted via ralph_ohr
- RT @ralph_ohr: Exploring the Emotional Landscape of #Innovation https://t.co/EiOKENxLya 1 year ago retweeted via ralph_ohr
- RT @ralph_ohr: The new automotive mandate: Moving from building products to building businesses https://t.co/52Zc3PQU2E #innovation #busine… 1 year ago retweeted via ralph_ohr